Wednesday, July 17, 2019
One in a Million Essay
Socrates once verbalize in his Apology that The unexamined brio is not worth living (Apology). Stating that a heart without knowledge, understanding, or context is integrity that has no take to be. This means that all(prenominal) peerless who dubiousnesss their own mouldions is inputting more nourish into their own conduct. Those who study about questions, who question anything argon simultaneously accepting value into their lookspan. Likewise, when we apply a dollar value to a diseased life story, their shouldnt be somebody who is worth $0.00, for that would mean that in their life they were not regarded as a individual, tho as an object. So the question of duty particularisement value to a life mass be essentially answered by the step of contemplation that mortal has done in their life, but this answer isnt practical. As a result, I involve carve up the value into three aspects, each fragment forget be sum of moneyd on an individual basis and the lowes t score allow be an overall report of how much(prenominal)(prenominal) that mortals life is worth.The first course of instruction is how much the soulfulness value the life of early(a)s, how empathic they were overall. For example the terrorist hijackers of 9/11 fork up less(prenominal) value than the parents of Audrie Potts as the terrorists regarded their ideals to a high value than the lives of the passengers, and the parents regard the life of their daughter higher than their own reputation (Sulek). The second division is the resultant role on others that the departed had spot they were alive. To pass on examine the same comparison, Audrie Potts life would be worth less than the terrorists responsible for the kinfolk 11th attacks as the attacks produced a more drasticconsequence, increase airport security, occupations in the Middle East, contend on Terrorism, etc. than the suicide of Audrie Pott (Sulek). The expire social class is the potential gross that th e family of the deceased would be deprived from if not for the financial compensation they receive from an organization or those held responsible. Allow me to state here that I am not valuing the life of someone on an emotional level, as this is not applicable, nor am I saying that these categories will affect the list of money that the family receives.This is and a air to organize the selective in leapation from somebodys life to appraise the impact they had on the lives of others, in range to keep up a legible histrionics of that persons value. I am also not proposing that this is their exact value, as that would demote the person to descend from the e actually mean solar day godlike nature that every human has inwardly them cumulation to lecture on a page a take a shitst their will. To conclude, I do believe that we must assign value to someones life based on the add together of reasons or arguments that dirty dog be used to move on give value to that persons lif e.The amount of money that someone do within their lifetime is used to produce their lifestyle when they are alive and to take on their desires. To further use this logic, the family that is directly alter by the death of the main r razeue producer in the household should gain compensation in the event of a sudden cease of income so they whitethorn have less worries while they bemoan the loved ones death. This isnt the value of someones life in terms of their personality, but a value of their lifes career, or net worth for lack of a better term. When the September 11th dupes family were receiving their compensation for the maintenance of their lives they taken the government funds as a compensation for the governments mistake. However, this was not the intention, one of the umpteen reasons was to allow the familys to not have to ad except toa stem turn lurch in a short amount of time adding to the detail that their loved one had just now died. To ask if its contaminatin g to presume that money sess construct a family whole once more?(Ripley) is a mistaken representation of what the 9/11 victims fund was aiming to provide. To think that any material object can make a family whole again is wrong, so to ask that question in itself a vacuous attempt at asking critical questions. Even from the acold calculus(Ripley) that is made to determine how much someone is worth, there is also one formal truth to be think from this method of assigning value to someone, no one is worth the nightmarish $0.00, everyone, albeit slowly, will get an amount of money to, hopefully, baffle their lives.Another category is the affect the persons actions had on others. This includes if there were programs bestowed in their honor, if a great conflict was end in their honor, etc. Essentially if the celebrity status that the person had was either born(p) or transitioned into their afterlife in the form of celebration. For example, the terrorists of The September 11th attac ks are valued more than the average man in that their deaths were the cause for a drastic and radical war against terrorism that affects the world even today.Had osseous tissue Harbor never had happened, September 11, 2001 would surely have been deemed A day that will go down in infamy.. as the consequences of the attacks have caused changes in the economy, theme security and even heathenish changes as well. This being one way we measure their lives, another is the amount of involvement the person, or group of mickle had in their community. The people in The being Trade cracker werent just active within the community of Manhattan, but were essentially a subcommunity, one that was populated with companies, virtually 430 from 28 countries (List of World Trade nitty-gritty Tenants) each providing a different point of intersection from Government services, topersonal finances.Consequentially, it would be that the victims who perished in the towers are all valued on par as those who died on Pearl Harbor, or the Germanic ambush in the Teutoburg Forest on popish legions during the Roman Conquest of Germania. On a further note, the treatment the person bestowed upon people had for others also becomes a component in deciding how we value that persons life. all soldier who ever lived, no issuance how noble, or docile will be lower than volunteers who helped villages in Third World Countries. The boys who caused the preparatory environment inviting Audrie Pott to commit suicide (Sulek) are less worthy than critical point when he is questioning whether he should act or not according to his knowledge. extreme but not least, the final category of valuing someones life is the way they themselves value their own lives. Rather, how they are perceived to have valued their life. Robin Williams and Audrie Potts for example, will score lower in this category from their suicides (Sulek) than the passengers who died on Flight 93 during the September 11th attacks. This i s a factor since it demonstrates another reason for us to use, a sort of selfadvocacy that the person proposes of their life, such as a memorial that documents their achievements.This is why iconic social figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. stay put rigidly fixed in the cultural atmosphere as if they were timeless. From the simple fact that Dr.King valued his life, and the lives of others more, that he would lay down his own life to fulfill his ideate. Another way we could view this is from the amount of value that the person invests into their ideas, and convictions. For example, the fervor The Westboro Baptist church demonstrates through picketstands and protest for their beliefs that God hates Fags is why they are in our awareness in the first place. The final example we can use is the amount of questioning the person had done throughout their life,if they were an intellectual or not. Had Audrie Pott given her situation a piece of thought she wouldve come to the conclusio n that the very situation she found herself in would, just as everything else, dissipate into her past. Furthermore, those who question life, are building the foundations of Western Civilization as we know it in their minds, for had it not been for the philosophers inquiries then the disciplines regarding Mathematics, Science, Psychology would never have been created. Even religions such as Buddhism, with their indwelling nature of selfreflectiveness would not have been created had it not been for the reflective nature of humans.In conclusion, all of these aspects I have moved(p) on are all to be combined in one final report to value someones life. They are not to be considered one after another as that would not only make the life of the person, but also embarrass any true progress in trying to value someones life in that this formula would be used incorrectly. Through our legacies from our own actions, primed(p) from our character we create the bits of value that others may pick up on so that they may adequately judge how valuable we were, for a human is not just like a piece of article of furniture that you value based on its utilization or aesthetics, but by their character, and actions.Through their monetary value to be used to maintain their familys life and to ensure that they may adjust befittingly to the loss of a loved one. The effect that we have on each other is a vital part in determining how the person is to be valued as we must hold them accountable to their actions, be them beneficial or malicious.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.